<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Re: 10 reasons I&#8217;ll be passing on the iPad</title> <atom:link href="http://www.dailyblogged.com/2006/re-10-reasons-ill-be-passing-on-the-ipad/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.dailyblogged.com/2006/re-10-reasons-ill-be-passing-on-the-ipad/</link> <description>Apple, Tech, Rants, &#38; More</description> <lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 13:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: Thomas</title><link>http://www.dailyblogged.com/2006/re-10-reasons-ill-be-passing-on-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-4193</link> <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 20:06:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogged.com/?p=2006#comment-4193</guid> <description>It seems when it comes to the iPad, the prices are all around fairly competitive. I mean, the crowd gasped at the Keynote when the iPad was introduced at $500. Especially since it was rumored to be released at $900, and then Apple sais it would cost less than $1000 (which are keywords for $999). But from a fairly priced device to extremely well priced data, Apple knows they&#039;re doing. Albeit, they are using dreaded AT&amp;T.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems when it comes to the iPad, the prices are all around fairly competitive. I mean, the crowd gasped at the Keynote when the iPad was introduced at $500. Especially since it was rumored to be released at $900, and then Apple sais it would cost less than $1000 (which are keywords for $999). But from a fairly priced device to extremely well priced data, Apple knows they&#8217;re doing. Albeit, they are using dreaded AT&amp;T.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://www.dailyblogged.com/2006/re-10-reasons-ill-be-passing-on-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-4192</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 19:49:09 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogged.com/?p=2006#comment-4192</guid> <description>14.9$ a month????? Even 30$ is very cheap, where I live i have to pay around 59$ to get a phone plan (This would be the cheapest one), the most expensive one I&#039;ve seen in here would be a 200$ phone plan.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>14.9$ a month????? Even 30$ is very cheap, where I live i have to pay around 59$ to get a phone plan (This would be the cheapest one), the most expensive one I&#8217;ve seen in here would be a 200$ phone plan.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://www.dailyblogged.com/2006/re-10-reasons-ill-be-passing-on-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-4191</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 07:26:11 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogged.com/?p=2006#comment-4191</guid> <description>I can see how the way I characterized it could be confusing; I&#039;ll update that section.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see how the way I characterized it could be confusing; I&#8217;ll update that section.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex</title><link>http://www.dailyblogged.com/2006/re-10-reasons-ill-be-passing-on-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-4190</link> <dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 07:12:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogged.com/?p=2006#comment-4190</guid> <description>Microsoft just modified Windows XP by enabling touch input and making the icons bigger; they didn&#039;t create a new interface. Apple trimmed down the OS, created a new interface, and included new graphical toolkits and APIs.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Microsoft just modified Windows XP by enabling touch input and making the icons bigger; they didn&#8217;t create a new interface. Apple trimmed down the OS, created a new interface, and included new graphical toolkits and APIs.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Thomas</title><link>http://www.dailyblogged.com/2006/re-10-reasons-ill-be-passing-on-the-ipad/comment-page-1/#comment-4189</link> <dc:creator>Thomas</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 07:01:31 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.dailyblogged.com/?p=2006#comment-4189</guid> <description>The main thing I&#039;m confused about is #3. You say that Apple&#039;s approach was much better, yet didn&#039;t they take the exact same approach as Microsoft; change the interface but keep the OS? Also, regarding #10, Steve Job&#039;s &lt;em&gt;did&lt;/em&gt; present the iPad as a Netbook Replacement.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The main thing I&#8217;m confused about is #3. You say that Apple&#8217;s approach was much better, yet didn&#8217;t they take the exact same approach as Microsoft; change the interface but keep the OS? Also, regarding #10, Steve Job&#8217;s <em>did</em> present the iPad as a Netbook Replacement.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
